The Achievement of Both Justice and Consent in Financial Transaction Contracts

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Sep 13, 2020
Mohammad Motleq Mohammad Assaf

Abstract

This study clarifies that the basis on which contracts are established is mutual consent, whereby property shall not be taken away from a person without their consent. The indication of mutual consent is the apparent wording of offer and acceptance under the condition of the absence of coercion that cancels consent. This coercion is illegal coercion that is unjust and that unlawfully ‎infringes the right of others to exercise free will.

However, if the opposite occurs, namely, if the right of agreement and consent in a contract leads to injustice or harm to others, then achieving both justice and consent by using coercion is the right thing to do. This type of coercion aims to achieve a rightful purpose that ensures justice and eliminates injustice and provides for restitution as well.

How to Cite

Assaf, M. M. M. . (2020). The Achievement of Both Justice and Consent in Financial Transaction Contracts. Al-Qasemi Journal of Islamic Studies, 5(1), 1–24. Retrieved from http://ojs.qsm.ac.il/index.php/ISJournal/article/view/605

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 12 | pdf Downloads 10

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Section
Articles
Share |