التّسليم عند النّحويّين العرب: : دراسة تحليليّة في نماذج تطبيقيّة

Abstract

The current study investigates one of the most argumentative techniques that Arabic grammarians have relied on in their debates, namely objecting statements. Objecting statements in Arabic grammar are divided into three categories: recognition of the authoritative, non-recognition of the authoritative and conditional recognition. The study specifically looks at the effects of the recognition of the authoritative and its forms in Arabic grammar and the extent to which Arabic grammarians have used this technique in a way that benefits from the analogies of logic, theology, and Islamic jurisprudence. The main question that this study attempts to answer is: What is the effect of the recognition of the authoritative as a technique of argumentation and persuasion in reversing intellectual perceptions and expanding students’ perceptions? The importance of this study lies in the fact that the recognition of the authoritative technique has often been used to defend a specific idea, doctrine, or sect – as a way to show opponents the flaws in their arguments in order to switch their views through the use of evidence and conclusive proof. By using a descriptive-analytical approach, this study shows how the recognition of the authoritative is important for teaching Arabic grammar because it helps students enhance their debate skills and develop their argumentation and persuasion skills, further improving their abilities to engage in dialogues, discussions, and research.